A pipeline company’s lawsuit against the environmental group could chill free speech, experts said. First Amendment issues ...

In March, a North Dakota jury found against Greenpeace in a highly watched trial, ordering the environmental group to pay pipeline company Energy Transfer more than $660 million in damages. The case ...

Greenpeace’s 2016 and 2017 protest campaign against Energy Transfer’s Dakota Access Pipeline was one of the group’s most ...

Court order forcing Greenpeace to pay $660m over pipeline protests will have 'chilling' impact on free speech, campaigners warn ...

The environmental group sticking to its principles should serve as model for activism under the second Trump administration ...

In a win for the oil and gas pipeline company Energy Transfer, a nine-person North Dakota jury found the environmental group Greenpeace liable for more than $660 million in damages and defamation ...

Greenpeace must pay a Texas-based pipeline company nearly $667 million in damages for the environmental advocacy group’s role in 2016-2017 protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline in North Dakota, ...

Energy Transfer also alleges that through defamation, Greenpeace pressured nearly half of the pipeline’s investors to withdraw or reduce their support for the project. Greenpeace maintains that ...

Experts called the verdict “beyond punitive.” The organization plans to appeal and has already filed a countersuit in Europe ...

The verdict of Energy Transfer v. Greenpeace has disturbing implications for freedom of speech. But activists aren’t letting corporates shut them up. If you didn’t follow the proceedings of ...

An interview with Greenpeace International General Counsel Kristin CasperOnward. Because we will not back down. We will not ...

By Mary Steurer, North Dakota Monitor, northdakotamonitor.com A Morton County jury on Wednesday ordered Greenpeace to pay ...