Yet Martin overlooks several speech-chilling precedents. To continue reading for FREE, please sign in. Sign In. Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

In the first case to establish free speech rights for students, Tinker v. Des Moines, the ACLU represented Mary Beth Tinker and two other Des Moines junior high school students who had been suspended ...

That was, after all, the point of Zelensky giving the speech. Given the responses from various members of Congress after the speech, the answer appears to be no.

In Chen v.Albany Unified School Dist., Judge Ronald Gould joined the panel opinion, but added the following; the opinion dealt with K-12 public schools' restrictions on student speech, where the ...

Since government cannot “induce, encourage or promote private persons to accomplish what it is constitutionally forbidden to accomplish,” per precedent set in 1973’s Norwood v.

Joe Biden Biden calls Trump immunity decision a 'dangerous precedent' in speech outlining radical SCOTUS changes President Biden wishes Congress to pass a constitutional amendment, ethics rules ...

In a decision that conservatives are mostly applauding, the Supreme Court will hear a case that will set a precedent on how far the government can go in suppressing free speech on social media.