Opinion
5don MSNOpinion
Supreme Court won't torch Voting Rights Act. But this dated practice has to go. | Opinion
The Supreme Court should make it clear that racial gerrymandering is illegal, even if it is in the name of racial justice.
The Supreme Court’s conservative majority has several avenues at its disposal as it appears poised to limit a central ...
17don MSN
Supreme Court seems inclined to limit race-based electoral districts under the Voting Rights Act
The Supreme Court appears ready to gut a key tool of the Voting Rights Act that's helped root out racial discrimination in ...
If Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act is gutted, states will have freedom to draw maps that dilute the power of communities ...
The Supreme Court is reviewing a case centered on Section 2 of the voting rights act, which prohibits electoral practices ...
The case, Louisiana v. Callais, was heard by the court and has drawn the attention of players in the ongoing tug-of-war over ...
The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case that could gut key protections in the Voting Rights Act. Elie Mystal, columnist ...
In 1965, Congress passed landmark civil rights legislation to stop racial discrimination in voting; part of the law could be ...
If the oral arguments are any indication, the Supreme Court may be about to achieve a remarkably bizarre outcome: using the ...
Shreveport Times on MSN
Louisiana delays elections to await Supreme Court decision on Voting Rights Act
Louisiana's Supreme Court case could limit states' ability to consider race when drawing congressional map boundaries.
21don MSN
Stakes are high for voting rights as Supreme Court again tackles Louisiana redistricting dispute
The conservative majority could use the case to further weaken the landmark Voting Rights Act, which was enacted to protect ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results