The court cited the First Amendment (freedom of speech), the Fourth Amendment (protection against unlawful search and seizure), and the Fourteenth Amendment (due process and equal protection).

The news drew hundreds of community members to the Lawn, with individuals using chants, speeches and signs to express their anger and fear at the federal government’s interference in higher education ...

Denmark has proposed sweeping legislation to curb the rise of AI-generated deepfakes, positioning itself as a leader in European digital rights protection. The suggested amendment to ...

The Supreme Court ruled Friday that Texas’s age-verification law for porn websites is constitutional and does not violate the ...

In dissenting opinions, Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson excoriated the Supreme Court’s Friday ruling on ...

The Karnataka government is preparing to introduce a new law that would criminalise online misinformation, with the draft ...

The court on Friday issued decisions on the final six cases that were left on its docket for the summer, including emergency ...

PIERRE, S.D. ( South Dakota Searchlight) — A Friday decision by the U.S. Supreme Court set the stage for a law restricting ...

A Houston-area family’s 10-year legal fight with Spring Branch ISD highlights the high costs and challenges parents face in ...

In a dissenting opinion, Sotomayor argued that the decision would “impose impossible administrative burdens on schools” by ...

ADVERTORIAL: Pinnacle Blooms Network, founded by mothers and backed by science, has transformed child development therapy in ...

The court on Friday issued decisions on the final six cases that were left on its docket for the summer, including emergency ...