The Department of Justice (DOJ) said that Google must sell Chrome in order to end search monopoly. Competition needs to be restored, and this is the way to sort out the problem in DOJ’s eyes.

Separating Chrome from Google and preventing deals for default ... Google's vice president of regulatory affairs, said the DOJ was pushing "a radical agenda that goes far behind the legal issues ...

[Related: Top 8 Cloud Platform Services Ranked: Azure, AWS, Google Lead Gartner Magic Quadrant] DOJ lawyers said Judge Mehta must impose a range of restrictions on Chrome and Android with the goal ...

“You take away Chrome from Google, it could start falling apart a bit. ... It would definitely have a ripple effect for Google Cloud.” According to the report by Bloomberg News, the DOJ will ...

Along with splitting off Chrome, prosecutors asked Mehta to bar Google from favoring its services ... it's "less clear" if he would embrace the DOJ's breakup proposal, The Associated Press said.

In a striking irony, the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) antitrust case against Google, which was decided last summer, may reduce competition—both in search and in access to the World Wide Web. The ...

In that proposal, the DOJ is going to specify specifically what those structural and behavioral remedies are going to be. Now, things that I need on the table are splitting out Google Chrome ...

Losing Chrome’s data would almost certainly guarantee a drastically different Google search engine. Google filed its response to the DOJ, arguing that the proposed remedies are much wider ...

this could impact Google’s current rankings and algorithms depending on how much data it takes from Chrome and how this is weighted. The DOJ suggests letting publishers opt out of Google’s ...