The court of appeals recognized the free speech implications of the TikTok ban but concluded the ban was justified by ...
The First Amendment should not be used to cut Americans’ access to TikTok, and the Supreme Court should step in.
Public trust in our judiciary is critical to American democracy. Unlike members of the executive and legislative branches, ...
ByteDance has until Jan. 19, 2025, when the bill is set to go into effect, to divest TikTok and sell the social media app.
An appeals court judge wrote that the law that would force a sale or ban of TikTok "survive[s] constitutional scrutiny." ...
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied TikTok’s petition to overturn the law — which requires ...
A federal appeals court panel on Friday unanimously upheld a law that could lead to a ban on TikTok as soon as next month, ...
Federal legislation requires TikTok's Chinese parent company to sell the platform by Jan. 19, or the app will be banned in ...
A federal appeals court in Washington upheld a law Friday that could result in social media giant TikTok’s eventual ban in ...
The court of appeals recognized the free speech implications of the TikTok ban but concluded the ban was justified by ...
Erwin Chemerinsky The free speech implications of the coming ban on TikTok in the United States are staggering and unprecedented. On Friday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ...